![]() Certainly, all this is very subjective.įor nearly a century, University of Iowa researchers have studied the science and technology of water management. MIX is cheap, just about 100€ for academic use, and you can put it on your tax. Borenstein ("Introduction to Meta-Analysis") is very useful especially if you use CMA. CMA is quite expensive (about 600€ for academic use), but save your time when you need to convert data of different type, and the book by M. If going to try only freeware, than I would try MetaXL, not RevMan. So Aref, I think, it depends on how much money you are able to spend on these programs. It is sadly common that you don't get figures of the same type for all included in synthesis studies. What I like in CMA, it is the possibility to input data in different format into the same synthesis. ![]() MIX also seems more intuitive and user-friendly for me than MetaXL. With full power of a modern Excel chart, the images you can get from MIX are astonishing and editors appreciate perfect images. The best part of MIX is almost absolute control on graphic output. However, I will stick with CMA ja MIX combination or just MIX (if calculations are not too complex). For a free software, it is definitely good and worth to try.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |